The antenna in the first generation iPad is located behind the apple.
Overheating? Well, okay. Is it charging strange? It's OK. Poor Wi-Fi reception? What difference does it make to us? We'll buy it anyway. Stop though. This time the problem really hasn't been solved out of thin air. According to numerous reports, Apple's third tablet "deservingly" holds the title of the least long-range device when it comes to wireless connectivity.
Portal browsers Tablet PC Review We checked the signal reception quality of Wi-Fi networks in the new iPad and were unpleasantly surprised by the result. The easiest way to understand the difference is by comparison. iPhone 4S shows the best “range” in all tests and under all circumstances. At a distance of 9 meters from the router, the fifth iPhone receives data at a speed of 5.16 MB/sec, the first iPad - 1.67 MB/sec, and the iPad 3 - only 0.28 MB/sec. This is the difference.
But what saves Apple this time is the fact that the iPad 3 has more RAM and overall processing power than other iDevices. The increased page rendering speed almost completely eliminates the disadvantages of signal reception. In addition, not all users are at extreme distances from their routers. I wonder if the new iPad is susceptible to the grip of death that plagued the second generation of Apple tablets. Judging by the fact that the antenna location has not changed, no one has solved that problem. [tpr]
/ Contact the author /
The antenna in the first generation iPad is located behind the apple. Overheating? Well, okay. Is it charging strange? It's OK. Poor Wi-Fi reception? What difference does it make to us? We'll buy it anyway. Stop though. This time the problem really hasn't been solved out of thin air. According to numerous reports, Apple's third tablet "deservingly" holds the title of the least long-range device when it comes to wireless connectivity. Portal browsers Tablet PC Review We checked the signal reception quality of Wi-Fi networks in the new iPad and were unpleasantly surprised by the result. The easiest way to understand the difference is by comparison. iPhone 4S shows the best “range” in all tests and under all circumstances. At a distance of 9 meters from the router, the fifth iPhone receives data at a speed of 5.16 MB/sec, the first iPad - 1.67 MB/sec, and the iPad 3 - only 0.28 MB/sec. This is the difference. But what saves Apple this time is the fact that the iPad 3 has more RAM and overall processing power than other iDevices. The increased page rendering speed almost completely eliminates the disadvantages of signal reception. In addition, not all users are at extreme distances from their routers. I wonder if the new iPad is susceptible to the grip of death that plagued the second generation of Apple tablets. Judging by the fact that the antenna location has not changed, no one has solved that problem. [
Loading...
