Which processor is better celeron or intel pentium. Intel Celeron and Pentium processors: full Ivy Bridge. Interactive work in 3D packages

The selection of a processor is a key decision on which the further performance of a personal computer will depend. Therefore, it is very important to understand what results you expect from it, and decide in favor of:

1. Manufacturer.
2. Generations of processors.
3. Lines of presented processors, selected generation.

So, if you plan to use the computer, not for computer games and do not install powerful software, then a processor with a mid-range performance will do just fine. In case of multitasking (multi-threading) and/or under high load with demanding programs or games, there is no doubt that you will need to raise the bar when choosing and purchasing a processor.

The central processing unit is like the main heart of any device, responsible for calculations. Incorrectly selected CPU with a powerful video card and/or high-frequency RAM, will not be able to fully reveal its potential, but will only slow down productivity.

This article will give short description and comparison of the Intel brand of microprocessors such as Pentium and Celeron.

Pentium generation processors

The fifth generation Pentium microprocessors are manufactured by Intel Corporation with 03/22/1993. They are designed for more serious tasks and are much faster than the Celeron line. Advantages: increased frequency and reasonable price, depending on the configuration. They are not designed for entertainment (modern demanding games), but they feel quite confident where the requirements are two cores and no more.

It is best, of course, to buy a microprocessor from the Pentium line, since it is much more powerful and has a long-term future. The official website lists 36 different processors, with minimum characteristics ranging from:

• 6 GHz – base frequency.
• 2 megabytes of cache memory.
• 2 cores.
• 2 streams.

This series has an integrated module - Intel HD, allowing you to function without a video card (external). This will save money if you don't need a lot of power to run your programs. Watching a movie or playing a simple game will not be a problem.

Celeron generation processors

A large family of low-budget microprocessors is the Intel Pentium Celeron. Celeron is a stripped down and cheaper version of the Pentium. It will be optimal for low-demanding people with a small budget.

Personal computers based on such CPUs are suitable for office work, as they have all the necessary functionality for surfing the World Wide Web, watching movies and working in text editors. They have lower performance compared to the more powerful line. reduced amount of L2 cache memory (second level) and bus frequency. Just like on the Pentium, there is an internal module - Intel HD.

The corporation's website lists 32 processors, with minimum characteristics ranging from:

• 5 GHz – base frequency.
• 1 megabyte cache memory.
• 2 cores.
• 2 streams.

Below is a comparison table of the minimum standard characteristics, showing the common and distinguishing points:

So, from the table discussed above, it is clear that the characteristics are almost identical and the price difference is usually no more than 15-20%. In order to save as much as possible, there is an OEM version, which includes one processor (no cooler, box, etc.). The maximum OEM package is a processor + a bag or cardboard (plastic capsule). Therefore, the key question is for what purposes it is planned to use Personal Computer? Having answered it, you can begin to select the product.

Comparing the heat dissipation of the Pentium and Celeron, the latter will be in a more advantageous light. The Celeron generation is famous for its durability (7-10 years), as it has low heat dissipation, and usually puts a strain on the power supply and itself. motherboard is reduced to a minimum. The Celeron can be used normally with a standard cooler. The air flow is usually enough to cool it. Even overclocked to 4.4.GHz it holds up perfectly without water cooling. On a Pentium, the factory fan will not be enough; it is worth considering the ventilation system of the case itself, even if you do not plan to overclock.

An excellent option is to buy a Celeron instead of a Pentium, and for the difference in price between them, purchase an additional SSD. Such a system will work at breakneck speed, despite its low price.

Measuring the performance on tests of modern Intel Pentium and Celeron, it is clear that Celeron is inferior quite a bit in performance, overclocking, cache memory level for the Pentium. For office or home use Without stressful loads, it is perfect. If you dream of having a gaming personal computer, don’t hesitate to take a Pentium, which has a Turbo overclocking mode.

Which processor is better for Gta5? Intel Pentium or Intel Celeron?

Most likely Pentium will be preferable. This is a more modern line; the stated requirements of the game include Intel Pentium. In any case, it is better to take a more modern processor; it is easier to find in a store and at the same price, the latter will be more powerful. I am always for moving forward in everything. I myself now have Intel Pentium Core 2 Quad Q6600, with it the game runs at minimum-medium graphics settings.

Sooner or later, each of us begins to realize that the power of his E2160 is no longer enough, and for some, the Athlon 64 x2 3800+ also seems very slow. And the owners of such processors, after some time, will go to the store and buy new processors. The owner of an E2160 will buy a brand new Intel, and the owner of an Athlon 64 x2 3800+ will buy an AMD that shines in the sun.

Why did they do this? Why didn't they need to compare Intel and Amd? Probably because each of these processors for a long time served its owner faithfully and truly.

By and large, the differences are in the size of the memory cache and the number of cores. The higher these two indicators, the more productive the processor will be. It's clear that Core line The iX will be much cooler than budget Celerons, which are unlikely to run GTA at all.

In general, it used to be always believed that the Celeron was a cropped version of the Pentium. I don’t know how far processor production has advanced now, but I think that the Intel Pentium itself is much better than the Celeron if their declared characteristics are approximately equal.

There is an unspoken rule: with Intel, only top-end processors can be considered full-fledged devices, everything else is rejection and there is no guarantee that all this will work to the limit of its capabilities. That is normal processors Intel is i7, i5, and maybe i3 (but it seems to me that not all models, for example, I3-41xx have a fairly low operating speed, which for some reason is not mentioned anywhere). Moreover, it is most comfortable to work with processors that have a turbo function, these are i5 and i7; they feel the load less than others. All other models, both Pentium G and Celeron, are defects of varying degrees, so they will never work better than top-end processors. If you choose between the Pentium G and Celeron, I would still go with the Pentium G; after all, the larger cache makes itself felt under load. Celeron is only suitable for printing documents and the Internet, and even then with brakes.

If the characteristics are the same, Pentium and Celeron have the same, or more precisely, approximately the same, clock speed, for example, cache memory size, etc. then this can apparently only happen in one case, when the Celeron is a more modern model, and the Pentium is outdated and therefore naturally better than the Celeron. It will have a more modern technical process, will work with faster memory, and may even cost less.

If Pentium or Intel Celeron are both from the same generation, then the maximum budget Celeron cannot have the same characteristics as Pentium. The latter is definitely faster.

Hello everyone. In fact, the difference between Celeron and Pentium is minimal. But many users may disagree with me, saying that Celeron is much weaker and, in principle, there is some truth here... And all because it was like that before. When there was a 775 socket or an even more ancient 478 socket, then in those days there were basically two families, these were Pentium and Celeron. I don't mean quad-core processors on socket 775, they appeared later.

So. That's when Celeron was much weaker. But starting with socket 1156, everything began to change, now Celeron is close to Pentium in performance and some users on the forum even advise buying it, since the power is almost the same. But I don’t think so, after all, Penek will be faster... it has 3 MB of cache, and Celeron has 2 MB..

And the whole point is that powerful processors ABOVE Penk appeared in socket 775 (but not immediately, but with the release of new chipsets), even then there were so-called quads, but there was still a difference between Penk and Celeron. But now it is already minimal. Technical process, modern technologies, in general, today's Celeron (1150 socket) is a couple of times more powerful than the old top-end Pentium 4 EE (775 socket), who would have thought...

Therefore, the difference between Penk and Celeron fluctuates around 10-15%, that’s approximately, but not more than 20%, that’s for sure. Basically the same as the price

But it’s true that Celeron has one big plus - it’s actually even cooler, that is, it heats up even less than Penek, and in principle it can be used with passive cooling. But at the same time, you need to think about ventilation in the case, because after all, the Celeron kit comes with a radiator with a fan for a reason.. *cute*

All I’m writing here is that the difference is small, I mean modern processors starting with socket 1156. I’ll tell you a secret, Celeron G3900, which is 1151 socket, frequency 2.8, 2 MB cache, sixth generation Skylake, well, so Well, it will be more powerful than even the quad-core Q9650 on socket 775, although it is the latest Yorkfield core...!

In general, I don’t know what to say. Because my opinion is that the difference in price between a modern Penk and a modern Celeron is exactly equal to their difference in performance. But there are Penka models that can be overclocked, for example the Pentium G3258 model. An overclocked Penek will already be head and shoulders above Celeron, keep this in mind. The price of a model that supports overclocking (that is, having an unlocked multiplier) is 10-15 bucks higher. But it's worth it, believe me...

For example, in this test, Celeron falls just short of Penk’s level:

And believe me, you may not even notice this difference, especially if the computer is intended for the office..

Here is another test and here the same situation will be repeated, the difference is very small:

Another test:

The tests themselves are not particularly important here, the main thing is that the processors here are modern, that is, this is real information in order to understand the difference.

And look here, Celeron 1037U, Celeron J1900, these are processors that are already included in motherboards, that is, soldered, they are not for ordinary computers at all, but for media centers. This is actually why they lose to desktop Celerons:

Here's another WinRAR test (the archiver has a built-in performance test):

Well, I hope that now you already understand that the difference in price is almost the same as the difference in performance. For an office PC or just a home PC, I would take Celeron. If you need a gaming PC, but don’t have a lot of money, then take only a Pentium that can be overclocked, for example, these are the G3260, G3258, G3420 models, these are all 1150 socket. This is what it shows CPU-Z program about G3420:

As you can see here, it’s 4.5 GHz and believe me, this is no longer a joke. And for this you can do without water cooling, it is enough to have a decent radiator with a decent cooler

The year 2013 is the year of the great 22nm breakthrough

Autumn is inevitably followed by winter, winter is followed by spring, and with the same inevitability we need to return to budget families of Intel processors for the LGA1155 platform. The inevitability is dictated by the fact that since late autumn (when we last dealt with this issue), although not revolutionary, but very serious changes have occurred in this market segment. Nothing unpredictable - if back then we saw the first Pentium on Ivy Bridge, now the new microarchitecture has become firmly established not only in the Pentium line, but also in Celeron. Moreover, the company’s pricing policy, traditionally, leads to the fact that the purchase of previous models by trade organizations loses all meaning: new ones are shipped at the same prices. Moreover, the process turned out to be so rapid that one model managed to disappear from the horizon altogether, almost never reaching Moscow retail.

To make it clearer, we decided to present such a unique table, which only needs a brief explanation: the first column is the “standard” price levels of processors in the budget segment, the second is the best that “lived” on them at the time of the material mentioned above, and the third is what “lives” there now. As you can see, models with four-digit numbers occupied all the “standard” niches, and similar processes were taking place in the area of ​​the “energy efficient” T-family. In fact, the last bastion of Sandy Bridge remained the single-core processors of the Celeron G400 line, but they were not of particular interest to the retail buyer before.

As for the usual models of the G500, G600 and G800 families, they remain in the wholesale price list, but cost like new. However, they can still be considered as candidates for purchase (as well as the quickly flying by Pentium G2010), but only due to the peculiarities of the retail market, which is updated with a noticeable delay. Accordingly, the inventory of the “old guys” must be sold off somehow, and the only way to attract attention to them is through price. Previously (when new models differed from old ones only in clock speed), this sometimes allowed for serious savings - as we already wrote, the opportunity to find an “old” Pentium G630 in stores at the price of a “new”, but slower Celeron G555 was quite real, and not hypothetical . But now it’s worth thinking carefully before taking such a step, taking into account in advance what you will have to lose. Those planning to use integrated graphics are generally better off not thinking about Sandy Bridge without a serious discount from the seller: we also compared HD Graphics of the second and third generations in the fall - with a devastating result for the first. And what has changed in terms of processor performance, which is more interesting to many (after all, despite all the progress, integrated graphics Intel gaming can still be called a decision only out of politeness)? We already know that Ivy is faster than Sandy “all other things being equal”, as well as the magnitude of this increase, but the massive arrival of the new microarchitecture in Celeron has led to the appearance of “not equal” ones. And what will be the final result? Today we will study this issue.

Test bench configuration

This is what almost the entire line of junior representatives of the Ivy Bridge microarchitecture looks like today - only the Pentium G2010 is missing, the reasons for its absence were given above. What you should pay attention to? Firstly, as it was easy to guess, the increase in clock frequencies continues - there is much more time left before the transition of Celeron and Pentium to LGA1150 than before the appearance of the new platform, so this extensive version of a creeping increase in performance “for the same money” was and remains main Secondly, as before, there are three lines of processors under two names, differing in the capacity of the third level cache and supported RAM frequencies. But if the L3 capacity has not changed, then the RAM has grown by one step: the G2100 family officially supports DDR3-1600, and the younger ones got DDR3-1333, which was previously the prerogative of only the Pentium G800. This is official, but in practice the situation is more interesting. Firstly, many motherboards based on “overclocker” chipsets allow you to set memory frequencies higher than the official ones. Secondly, even on non-overclocking models, the restrictions are more or less strictly observed for the G2000, but not the G1600: our “old lady” on the H67, for example, offered DDR3-1600 among the acceptable options for the latest line. Apparently, the origins of this confusion must be sought somewhere in the depths of Intel, where they decided to make an easing for Celeron - they are already “offended” by L3 capacity and frequencies, so additional restrictions may be less stringent. However, we have already studied the issue of performance gains when increasing the memory frequency from 1066 to 1333 MHz, which resulted in an estimate of 2%, and between 1333 and 1600 MHz the difference is even smaller, so this issue is only relevant when using an integrated video core. For now (in tests using the current version of the methodology) we use frequencies no higher than 1333 MHz for all LGA1155 processors.

Who should we compare the new processors with? Since there are no global changes in technical specifications did not happen, we decided to limit ourselves to “intraspecific” competition, once again taking the “tops” of three families of dual-core Sandy Bridge. It seems to us that this will be enough - AMD in this price class offers processors that are slightly different in organization, which, naturally, both overtook and will overtake the “classic” dual-core Intel processors where they could. And they will continue to lag behind them where they lagged behind :) In general, we will not give unnecessary reasons for continuing holy wars between fans of both companies, but will simply see what the new microarchitecture gives in this particular class of processors.

Testing

Traditionally, we divide all tests into a number of groups and show on diagrams the average result for a group of tests/applications (you can find out more about the testing methodology in a separate article). The results in the diagrams are given in points; the performance of the reference test system from the 2011 sample site is taken as 100 points. It is based on the processor AMD Athlon II X4 620, but the amount of memory (8 GB) and video card () are standard for all tests of the “main line” and can only be changed within the framework of special studies. For those who are interested in more detailed information, again, it is traditionally proposed to download a table in Microsoft Excel format, in which all the results are presented both converted into points and in “natural” form.

Interactive work in 3D packages

Note that the processors are lined up in the form of a neat ladder, despite the similarity in performance characteristics (and the G1610 has a slightly lower frequency than the G555) - there is a certain increase from the change in microarchitecture. But there is nothing new in this - this was clear from the previous article. We remind you that the prices remain the same. Or even formally decreased.

Final rendering of 3D scenes

Another illustration of creeping progress while maintaining positions. The only interesting thing is that the Pentium G2130 has already almost achieved a result of 100 points. Let us remember that the “scale unit” is the Athlon II X4 620, equipped with four computing cores. However, this processor is very old, and at one time it was far from the fastest quad, but the result is still interesting. If only because the dual-core, but four-threaded (also old, by the way) Core i3-530 from 2010 was slower.

Packing and Unpacking

The greater growth in the younger families and the almost complete lack of progress in the older ones is largely due to the fact that we limited ourselves to DDR3-1333 memory for all processors.

Audio encoding

Pure mathematics, and even algorithms that have not been updated for a long time - it is clear that “classic” dual-core processors have nothing special to catch here. On the other hand, at the same frequency, Ivy is about 5% faster than Sandy, which, given the similarity of the test subjects, allowed the Celeron G1620 to almost catch up with the Pentium G645 - which has a higher clock frequency and in general... Pentium at least, and not some Celeron.

Compilation

And again, no changes. However, those who are counting on them, we think, have already quickly moved to conclusions :) From a more or less curious point, the G2020 is almost catching up with the G870, despite the 200 MHz difference in clock frequency.

Mathematical and engineering calculations

And here not only the G2020 is capable of such “feats,” but also the G1620, which is as close as possible to the G645. In general, despite the fact that the main changes during the transition from Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge are not concentrated in the processor cores, sometimes they lead to a quite visible effect. Relatively visible, of course.

Raster graphics

Repetition of what has been covered. Actually, it couldn’t be otherwise - the processors are very similar. Despite the difference in microarchitecture, names and positioning. Once again, the most interesting thing is that, in general, the practical difference between the Celeron G555 and Pentium G2130 is about 25% - in this situation, looking for differences between models that are closer to each other is, naturally, a thankless task.

Vector graphics

Video encoding

We didn’t comment on the previous diagram because we were tired of it, but this one is perhaps the most interesting of all. In any case, it differs from the rest: the advantages of Ivy Bridge over previous models are almost visible to the naked eye. In fact, the Celeron G1620 managed to not only catch up, but also overtake the Pentium G645, and the Pentium G2020 exactly repeated the results of the G870, i.e., the new microarchitecture made it possible to compete on an equal footing with higher-frequency processors from families positioned higher. And, by the way, a result of 100 points (i.e., the level of the Athlon II X4 620) has already been achieved by two dual-core Intel processors, and two more completely exceed this level.

Office software

It was faster than necessary, but it became even faster - what can I add? :)

Java

Another case when the “younger new” catches up with the “older old”, but otherwise there is traditionally nothing interesting: after all, all the tested processors are very similar to each other, differing only in small things.

Games

The superiority of the new microarchitecture over the old one is relatively great - even the lack of cache memory (which is very important here) did not interfere. However, the superiority is due, in fact, to one single game: F1 2010. Which “slows down” on all low-threaded processors, but slows down on Ivy Bridge to a lesser extent than on Sandy Bridge. As we have already written, all other things being equal, this “handbrake release” increases the frame rate by as much as 30% or more, which significantly exceeds the average increase in Ivy over Sandy. But where there are enough computing threads (Core i3 and higher), the absolute level of performance itself is much higher, but such breakthroughs are not observed. In general, as we can see, architectural improvements can work differently in different programs and on processors of different classes, so they need to be assessed as a whole, and not based on one example (whatever it may be).

Multitasking environment

Dual-core - it is dual-core. Any progress is observed only in younger families, i.e. where productivity was lacking to the maximum extent. Why is this interesting? And the fact that the frequencies of younger Celeron/Pentiums are comparable to the frequencies of mobile and (to an even greater extent) ultramobile processors. And it is precisely in such conditions that microarchitecture optimizations have the greatest impact. That is, the thesis is once again confirmed that Ivy Bridge is primarily for mobile market. That’s why the older models looked so pale a year ago compared to their predecessors - the latter were already doing well. But lower power consumption and higher operating efficiency at low clock speeds in low-end processors are what laptops need. And, of course, the dramatic improvement in the built-in video core is from the same area: a desktop user is free to choose a video card, but in a more compact systems using anything powerful is already problematic.

Total

Of course, the final summary chart looks exactly like most of the ones in this article, but... Doesn't quite paint the picture. Simply because in all “three-digit” lines we took the older models, i.e., the latest ones at the time of the official transition of these lines to Ivy Bridge. However, they appeared as a result of more than a year of development of the corresponding families, and not all at once, so in retail you can also stumble upon older representatives - up to the Celeron G530 and Pentium G620. Therefore, let's try to take a look at the general state of affairs in the camp of old and new budget processors.

In general, it is indicative: at equal frequencies, Pentium is always better than Celeron of its generation, but the new Celeron is better than the old Pentium. And among the various sub-lines of the latest family, the transition to a new architecture also provides more than extensive little things, such as a slight increase in memory speed. And at the very top of the segment, everything is also clear: the transition to a new microarchitecture provided a greater increase than a simple increase in clock frequency, but Intel did not abandon the latter either. Moreover, Ivy Bridge is more economical than Sandy Bridge, so the only thing that can restrain creeping progress is the reluctance to arrange intra-company competition with more expensive families. But as clock speeds increase in expensive models, it is possible to move forward in the budget segment.

Actually, this is what modern price reductions look like “Intel’s way.” In the summer of 2011, 110 final points (Pentium G840) of our method were estimated at $75 wholesale, but now the Celeron G1620 gives almost the same amount with a wholesale price of $52 (well, we can already conclude that after the release of the G1630, inevitable as the collapse of capitalism, this processor will displace the G1610 from the $42 price bracket). Moreover, if we talk about the cheapest computers, then they involve the use of an integrated video core, and in this area the advantage of the third generation HDG over the second is generally noticeable to the naked eye. It is clear that this still does not make integrated Intel graphics a gaming solution, but the user will experience less inconvenience. In general, in a nutshell, the situation can be characterized as follows: it has become a little better and a little cheaper. There are no hints of revolution, but no one promised it.

Intel has earned fundamental trust from active users desktop gaming PCs, work And computers for home. Reliable and high-performance - this, of course, is about its modern multi-core central processing units . But choosing between AMD And Intel, many of us are faced with very confusing series and names of crystals from the “blue” chipmaker.

This is an instruction on how to understand processors Intel V 2017 what is better in the series Core what characteristics mean model series i3, i5 And i7, and where did they go? Intel Pentium And Celeron?

What kind of processors does Intel have in 2017?

Modern Intel processors are divided into three types of the Core family.

Intel processors“Core i” differ from each other:

Level cache(own super memory is a very important characteristic that helps the CPU perform tasks more efficiently);

The presence and absence of certain technologies;

architectural decisions;

Goals and your marketing purpose.

Intel Core i3

These are dual-core processors equipped with technology Hyper-Threading. It helps improve performance under high load. It is enough for simple games and most applications under Windows.

Family Intel Core i3 does not have a large cache, does not support the technology Turbo Boost and is most suitable for work and home computers, where the main tasks are related to the Internet, web browsing, light games and office programs.

Intel Core i5

Quad-core processors without Hyper-Threading, but with faster processing of workload-intensive tasks physical level. Optimal choice for lovers of games and resource-intensive applications. In terms of performance, they often exceed the capabilities Core i3.

Intel Core i7

Quad-core processors with Hyper-Threading for computer enthusiasts, gamers (for gaming PCs) and professionals. High level cache memory, advanced integrated graphics technologies and the company's latest achievements at the core architecture level.

Where did the Intel Pentium and Celeron processors go?

There are practically no old processors left on sale Intel. Series Pentium(for home computers and gaming) and Celeron(working systems) by 2017 were officially transferred from the architectural range to the brand category.

Intel Pentium processors not issued since 2009. Since then, the name has been used as a brand for some entry-level products based on the Intel Core architecture.

Intel Celeron processors finally phased out of commercial production in 2011, giving way to the Atom, Core and in some cases Pentium series.

Everyone thinks that Core i3 is simply cheaper, and Core i7 is more expensive - that’s not true

The well-established opinion that Intel thus segmented its desktop processors into inexpensive ones Core i3, mass medium-budget Core i5 and high performance Core i7 for enthusiasts - not entirely true. The model numbers in each family will completely confuse you.

Can you tell what the difference is between the Intel Core i5-6400 and the Core i5-7600K?

Central processors within the same series may differ in performance levels, different modifications, and even generations. Now we will figure out in a few steps what all these numbers and letters mean. You can immediately determine which processor, for example, Intel Core i5, is better.

What does the number mean in Intel Core processors after i3/i5/i7?

Number 6 in Intel Core i5- 6 400 means generation number (“sixth Intel generation Core"), as 7 in Core i5- 7 600K means 7 generation of Intel processors for Windows 10. This way you can determine which of them is newer and arrange the models in order.

The last three digits determine SKU. They actually show how powerful the processor is within the product line. Core i5-7 600 K will be faster compared to Core i5-7 500 K.

Letters in the name indicate various additional qualities of the Intel Core processor. Here are the differences:

H- high-performance graphics.

K- ability to unlock overclocking of Intel processor.

Q- four physical cores.

QM- the same, but for mobile PCs.

T- Optimized for efficient desktop PCs.

U- optimized with low power consumption for mobile computing.

How to compare Intel, AMD, laptop, PC processors?

There is a universal online service where you can enter the processor model identifier and get a table with a complete comparison of characteristics and features: cpuboss.com.